Email Archiving: The Broker-Dealer’s First Line of Defense With Regulatory Penalties

December 29, 2020by Marianna Shafir Esq.

Subscribe to the Smarsh Blog Digest

Subscribe to receive a monthly digest of articles exploring regulatory updates, news, trends and best practices in electronic communications capture and archiving.

Smarsh handles information you submit to Smarsh in accordance with its Privacy Policy. By clicking "submit", you consent to Smarsh processing your information and storing it in accordance with the Privacy Policy and agree to receive communications from Smarsh and its third-party partners regarding products and services that may be of interest to you. You may withdraw your consent at any time by emailing privacy@smarsh.com.

This article was originally published by Digital Wealth News.

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic notwithstanding, FINRA continues to proceed at full speed when it comes to penalizing financial advisors for noncompliance with recordkeeping and supervision obligations. In particular, one recurring area where significant penalties can be imposed is with a financial advisor’s outside business activities (OBA).

Rising risks of OBA issues

Multiple instances abound, but as just one recent example of this, FINRA fined a financial advisor $5,000 because she exceeded the scope of her approved outside investment advisory business by charging asset-management fees.

The findings stated that the financial advisor in question created her own registered investment adviser (RIA) firm  of which she was the sole owner and employee  communicating via email to her broker-dealer that this business would only charge hourly fees and fixed, one-time financial planning fees. The firm approved her outside business based on these representations.

Subsequently, the advisor began offering a new service to her advisory clients where she would charge an annual 1.5% asset-management fee for managing variable annuity subaccounts. Not only did this advisor fail to disclose this new service and the associated fees to the firm, she allegedly made inaccurate statements in her annual compliance questionnaires to the firm via email.

While the financial penalties in this particular instance were not catastrophic, it is noteworthy that the penalties applied only to the financial advisor, with the advisor’s broker-dealer escaping unscathed. Why? In this case, the broker-dealer’s email archives were sufficiently comprehensive and clear in shielding the firm from the financial advisor’s outside business activities.

Robust email archiving to the rescue

Put simply, broker-dealers can avoid being penalized by the regulators for wrongdoing among individual professionals if they can clearly demonstrate that they are proactively and sufficiently capturing and monitoring emails.

As such, it is more important than ever for broker-dealers to understand how capturing and archiving electronic communications can be useful for defensive purposes, including detecting and addressing problems before they spiral into a very significant crisis situation.

Indeed, archived emails can serve as a first-line defense for broker-dealers when it comes to inoculating the broader business against wrongdoing among individual professionals.

Structuring the right process

At the end of the day, the goal of reviewing electronic communications — including emails — is to ensure that firm executives and financial advisors are not committing wrongdoing, including unauthorized outside business activities.

To support this goal, it is crucial to develop procedures that clearly identify the person or persons responsible for determining whether a violation has occurred and whether it is of a nature that requires reporting under regulatory rules.

These procedures should also document the level of seniority of the home office individuals (e.g., General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer or a senior staff committee) responsible for determining if violations occurred.

From there, it is also important to establish a protocol for escalating violations, and potential violations, while also providing a process for reporting internal conclusions of the violations.

Minor violations can be resolved in-house while significant violations must be reported to FINRA and other authorities.

Remote work raises the potential stakes

With more employees working remotely, this is a good time to review your firm’s records retention policies, including email archiving.

This has never been more critical than it is today, as the pandemic has accelerated the digital experience and the volume of data. Broker-dealers must rethink how employees can best communicate and collaborate on a digital basis while staying compliant.

Share this post!

Marianna Shafir Esq.
Smarsh Blog

Our internal subject matter experts and our network of external industry experts are featured with insights into the technology and industry trends that affect your electronic communications compliance initiatives. Sign up to benefit from their deep understanding, tips and best practices regarding how your company can manage compliance risk while unlocking the business value of your communications data.

Get a Quote

Tell us about yourself, and we’ll be in touch right away.

Smarsh handles information you submit to Smarsh in accordance with its Privacy Policy. By clicking "submit", you consent to Smarsh processing your information and storing it in accordance with the Privacy Policy and agree to receive communications from Smarsh and its third-party partners regarding products and services that may be of interest to you. You may withdraw your consent at any time by emailing privacy@smarsh.com.

Contact Us

Tell us about yourself, and we’ll be in touch right away.