2026 Regulatory and Compliance Predictions: From Recalibration to Execution
TL;DR: 2026 will test execution, not intent. Regulators are moving from guidance to proof, expecting firms to demonstrate real governance across AI use, digital communications, individual accountability and crypto operations. Firms that focus on visibility, ownership and operational controls — not just policy — will be best positioned to withstand regulatory scrutiny.
After a year of regulatory recalibration in 2025, 2026 is shaping up to be a year focused on fundamentals and execution. Regulators have signaled a willingness to modernize and clarify expectations, but they are equally clear that firms must now demonstrate how governance works in practice.
The question facing compliance leaders is no longer whether they are adapting to change, but whether they can prove it.
Why tracking regulatory and compliance trends matter
Regulatory change rarely arrives all at once. It builds through signals — examination focus, enforcement patterns and supervisory commentary — long before formal rules appear. Firms that identify and interpret these trends early gain time to strengthen controls, align governance and address blind spots before regulators do it for them.
In 2026, that advantage will matter more than ever. As oversight of AI, digital communications and emerging technologies intensifies, compliance leaders who anticipate where scrutiny is heading can shift from reactive remediation to proactive risk management. The result is not just fewer surprises, but stronger, more defensible compliance programs built for sustained regulatory pressure.
Prediction 1: AI governance moves from principles to proof
Artificial intelligence dominated regulatory conversations in 2025. In 2026, it may dominate examinations.
Financial services regulators are unlikely to introduce sweeping AI-specific rules at the US federal level. Instead, the SEC, FINRA and other financial regulators will continue to apply existing recordkeeping, supervision, disclosure and data protection requirements and expect firms to map AI use cases back to those obligations. Regulators have been clear that these rules are intentionally technology-agnostic. The same expectations apply whether activities are performed manually or supported by AI.
"Regulators are not asking what AI tools firms are using. They’re asking whether governance, documentation and supervisory controls actually exist around them."
Meeting that expectation will become more challenging in 2026 as AI governance grows more complex. Regulatory approaches are diverging across federal, state and international levels. While US federal regulators continue to emphasize a principles-based, technology-agnostic framework, state initiatives and international standards are moving faster and, in some cases, more prescriptively.
The result is a fragmented compliance landscape in which firms face overlapping and sometimes inconsistent expectations around data protection, transparency, accountability and risk management. Even firms operating primarily in the United States may feel downstream effects as global standards influence vendor practices, data-handling requirements and supervisory expectations.
In this environment, firms that treat AI governance as a documentation exercise rather than an operational discipline will struggle to demonstrate control when regulators come calling. The first major disciplinary case involving the misuse of AI is likely to occur in 2026, which could quickly shift regulatory focus and require firms to test and deploy agile controls as enforcement patterns emerge.
Prediction 2: Shadow AI becomes the fastest growing compliance blind spot
As firms accelerate their use of artificial intelligence, one of the most significant risks in 2026 will not come from formally approved tools. It will come from the AI that compliance teams never sanctioned and, in many cases, never see.
Shadow AI refers to AI-enabled tools and features used by employees without formal oversight, governance or integration into a firm’s compliance program. These tools are often embedded inside everyday applications and adopted quietly by employees seeking efficiency. Unlike traditional shadow IT, shadow AI is harder to detect and easier to justify internally because it can be framed as supporting business goals to embed AI into everyday workflows.
The compliance risk is enterprise-wide — and it extends beyond regulatory exposure. AI-powered features can generate business communications, recommendations, summaries and analyses that fall outside existing retention, supervision and review workflows. Sensitive client or firm data may be entered into public or third-party models without clear visibility into how that data is stored or reused. Marketing and client-facing content may be created or refined using AI without required disclosures or compliance review.
"If you’re not keeping certain records about how AI tools are being used, how are you supervising the output? It becomes very difficult to supervise what you can’t see."
Regulators are unlikely to view shadow AI as a novel exception. Because existing rules are technology-agnostic, firms remain responsible for supervising and retaining AI-influenced communications, whether or not the tools were formally approved.
"Shadow AI is really off-channel risk on steroids. Inputs and outputs matter, and firms need governance around both."
In 2026, firms that fail to bring visibility, ownership and accountability to AI use across the organization will struggle to defend their compliance posture. Those that treat shadow AI as a governance problem rather than a disciplinary one will be better positioned to manage risk before regulators identify it for them.
Prediction 3: Off-channel communications become a governance signal
By 2026, off-channel communications will be treated less as a standalone violation and more as a signal of deeper governance issues.
Rather than another massive wave of enforcement, regulators are expected to focus on what persistent off-channel use reveals about a firm’s culture, supervision and accountability. This includes activity occurring within collaboration platforms, embedded chat features and AI-assisted tools that blur the line between approved and unapproved communications.
"Off-channel activity is increasingly treated as a warning sign of broader governance and supervision failures, not the end offense itself."
This shift raises the stakes. Firms that address off-channel risk only tactically may find that recurring gaps invite broader scrutiny, as they speak to a firm’s ability to defend its practices and may hinder regulators from completing their work efficiently.
Prediction 4: Individual accountability continues to expand
Regulators in 2026 are expected to continue holding individuals accountable when governance breaks down.
Executives, supervisors and compliance officers will face scrutiny when they ignore known risks, fail to escalate issues or allow controls to exist only on paper. In an environment where AI and digital communications accelerate decision-making, regulators will continue to look for clear lines of responsibility and evidence of active oversight.
"Companies act through people, and enforcement increasingly reflects that reality."
Prediction 5: Crypto compliance shifts from novelty to infrastructure
As institutional adoption of crypto accelerates, regulators will expect firms to demonstrate consistent operational compliance — not just policy awareness. This reinforces the technology-agnostic nature of regulation: An exchange of value between parties over a platform transmitting tokenized value remains a financial activity, whether defined as an asset or a security.
Key focus areas will include:
- Clear disclosures about product structure and custody
- Accurate, balanced marketing communications
- Strong recordkeeping and fraud prevention controls
Firms that engage in crypto and treat compliance as a core business function, rather than a reactive exercise, will be best positioned in 2026.
What compliance leaders should do now
Firms preparing for 2026 should focus less on predicting regulation and more on strengthening compliance fundamentals:
- Inventory AI-enabled tools and features, sanctioned or not
- Map AI use cases to existing recordkeeping and supervision requirements
- Verify that communications are captured, retained and reviewed
- Assign clear ownership for AI and digital governance
- Treat culture and change management as compliance risks
"Any change in regulatory tone doesn’t change the fundamentals of information risk management. Firms that scale back now will struggle when priorities swing again."
The bottom line
2026 will reward firms that can demonstrate visibility, accountability and control across people, processes and technology. Compliance leaders who act now won’t just keep pace with regulators — they’ll be positioned for what comes next.
Share this post!
- Measuring the effectiveness of a communications compliance program - January 23, 2026
- 2026 Regulatory and Compliance Predictions: From Recalibration to Execution - January 5, 2026
- 2025 Regulatory Compliance and Enforcement Recap: Recalibration, Not Retreat - December 18, 2025
- SEC Marketing Rule FAQs (2026): What the Latest Guidance Means for Compliance Teams - January 20, 2026
- SEC 2025 Marketing Rule Risk Alert: Key Compliance Gaps and What Firms Must Do Now - December 30, 2025
- Beyond Email: Supervising Modern Communications - November 25, 2025
Smarsh Blog
Our internal subject matter experts and our network of external industry experts are featured with insights into the technology and industry trends that affect your electronic communications compliance initiatives. Sign up to benefit from their deep understanding, tips and best practices regarding how your company can manage compliance risk while unlocking the business value of your communications data.
Ready to enable compliant productivity?
Join the 6,500+ customers using Smarsh to drive their business forward.
More Resources
Subscribe to the Smarsh Blog Digest
Subscribe to receive a monthly digest of articles exploring regulatory updates, news, trends and best practices in electronic communications capture and archiving.
Smarsh handles information you submit to Smarsh in accordance with its Privacy Policy. By clicking "submit", you consent to Smarsh processing your information and storing it in accordance with the Privacy Policy and agree to receive communications from Smarsh and its third-party partners regarding products and services that may be of interest to you. You may withdraw your consent at any time by emailing [email protected].
FOLLOW US